![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
review: The Little Book of Fungi
Apr. 7th, 2025 02:29 pma review of The Little Book of Fungi by Britt A. Bunyard
I'm a bit wary of Little Books of this or that, I don't really trust them to be worthwhile in terms of quality. But I figured since I don't have much base knowledge of mycology, this might be okay as a primer or very basic reference work for me. That was a mistake, my first instinct was correct.
The Little Book of Fungi is a collection of fun facts that is mostly intended to look pretty. (The ochre clothbound cover does look very nice. The blurb is a sticker that I assume can be removed to leave a tastefully minimalistic outside with just the title, the author, and a small stylised bunch of mushrooms.) The inside is very heavily illustrated, with the page area divided about equally between text and illustrations. Additionally, the pages are very thick (for the colour images), so the number of pages is smaller than you might expect for the book's thickness (not very thick). All this means that there is very little text.
The text feels messy to me. The way information that seems related to me is sprinkled through different chapters feels disorganised; the organisation within the two-page sub-chapters feels wonky sometimes; and occasionally there's a sentence that doesn't quite make sense. There are too many sentences starting with "Amazingly," for my liking. (I don't think you should start a sentence with "Amazingly," if the previous sentence already described something as "amazing".) Sometimes the information of two not-very-info-heavy sentences is summarised in a third sentence.
The illustrations are pretty, but not always very illustrative. Sometimes they're just nice photos or drawings of mushrooms (and hey, I'm a mushroom image enjoyer), but don't otherwise add much for how much page area they take away from potential text. Sometimes they are (I assume) meant to explain something, but because the parts of the illustration are not labeled, I'm left with no idea what I'm looking at.
And, you know, the book in general isn't very informative. There were plenty of facts I didn't know, of course, but not much in the way of insights. I guess if you're already read Merlin Sheldrake's Entangled Life (for example), I'd say The Little Book of Fun Facts is worth giving a pass.
I'm a bit wary of Little Books of this or that, I don't really trust them to be worthwhile in terms of quality. But I figured since I don't have much base knowledge of mycology, this might be okay as a primer or very basic reference work for me. That was a mistake, my first instinct was correct.
The Little Book of Fungi is a collection of fun facts that is mostly intended to look pretty. (The ochre clothbound cover does look very nice. The blurb is a sticker that I assume can be removed to leave a tastefully minimalistic outside with just the title, the author, and a small stylised bunch of mushrooms.) The inside is very heavily illustrated, with the page area divided about equally between text and illustrations. Additionally, the pages are very thick (for the colour images), so the number of pages is smaller than you might expect for the book's thickness (not very thick). All this means that there is very little text.
The text feels messy to me. The way information that seems related to me is sprinkled through different chapters feels disorganised; the organisation within the two-page sub-chapters feels wonky sometimes; and occasionally there's a sentence that doesn't quite make sense. There are too many sentences starting with "Amazingly," for my liking. (I don't think you should start a sentence with "Amazingly," if the previous sentence already described something as "amazing".) Sometimes the information of two not-very-info-heavy sentences is summarised in a third sentence.
The illustrations are pretty, but not always very illustrative. Sometimes they're just nice photos or drawings of mushrooms (and hey, I'm a mushroom image enjoyer), but don't otherwise add much for how much page area they take away from potential text. Sometimes they are (I assume) meant to explain something, but because the parts of the illustration are not labeled, I'm left with no idea what I'm looking at.
And, you know, the book in general isn't very informative. There were plenty of facts I didn't know, of course, but not much in the way of insights. I guess if you're already read Merlin Sheldrake's Entangled Life (for example), I'd say The Little Book of Fun Facts is worth giving a pass.
